For HR, Reward & People leaders in organisations preparing for pay gap reporting—I help you identify hidden risks, build a clear narrative, and feel confident before your data goes public.
Check your pay riskUK & EU reporting cycles start 2027. Are you ready to stand behind your numbers?
Pay gaps that look defensible on paper can unravel under scrutiny. From employees, journalists, or a board that wants clear answers.
You need a story that holds. For your CEO, your employees, and your stakeholders—not just a spreadsheet that technically complies.
The data matters. But what most leaders are really looking for is peace of mind—before the deadline, before the board meeting, before someone else asks first.
A focused, independent diagnostic — typically 2–4 weeks. Designed to give you a clear picture of where your pay system creates risk or confusion—and help you find the right language for leadership, employees, and stakeholders.
Not just the headline gap—but where within your structure pay decisions are hardest to defend, and why.
A clear, honest explanation of your pay picture—one you can take into a board meeting, an all-hands, or a press enquiry.
Prioritised actions you can act on immediately—without commissioning a six-month programme.
Sometimes the most useful thing is someone who isn't inside the politics of your organisation—and can say clearly what they see.
In Russia—where equal pay law exists but enforcement is essentially zero—I led a voluntary salary equity review and implemented a structured pay management system from scratch. No regulator was watching. No public report was due. The leadership team simply decided it was the right thing to do.
That project taught me something no compliance-driven work ever could: what it actually takes to convince leadership to act without external pressure. How to surface invisible pay tensions. How to build a system people trust. How to explain the business case when there's no deadline forcing the conversation.
Experience built at
Pay equity work looks very different depending on where you are. I've worked directly in the UK, Russia, and Kazakhstan—and coordinated UK frameworks with local teams in India and the Middle East.
My UK experience comes from working at Arup—a global organisation operating under mandatory pay gap reporting. Seeing how a large employer navigates that reality from the inside is its own kind of education.
Coordinating UK pay frameworks with local HR teams across both regions showed me where global standards meet local practice—and where the gap between policy and reality is widest.
Working in environments where enforcement is weak taught me something compliance-driven work rarely does: what it takes to build a fair pay system when no external pressure is forcing anyone to act.
Pay equity looks different depending on where you're standing.
Having worked across five regulatory environments—from no enforcement to mandatory public reporting—I bring a perspective shaped by what actually happens on the ground, not just what the framework says should happen.
Different situations call for different solutions. Here's a straightforward overview to help you think about what fits your needs.
| Large Consulting Firms | SaaS Platforms | Equal Pay Review | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Large-scale reward transformation, legal risk management, multi-workstream programmes | Ongoing monitoring, annual reporting at scale, data infrastructure | Pre-reporting diagnostic, one-off health check, narrative preparation |
| Typical timeline | Several months | Ongoing subscription | Typically 2–4 weeks, depending on the complexity of your pay structure and data |
| Primary output | Strategy, transformation roadmap, legal documentation | Dashboards, automated reports | Risk summary, clear narrative, immediate actions |
| Investment | Significant — reflects scope and team size | Annual licence fee | Fixed project fee — discussed at discovery call |
We discuss your context, concerns, and timeline. No obligation.
Confidential analysis of your pay data and current reporting approach.
Clear findings on risks, gaps, and narrative recommendations.
Walk through findings and immediate steps with your team.
Not a list of deliverables. What shifts for you and your organisation.
Pay structures that looked fine on paper—until mapped against role, tenure, and grade. The gaps aren't always where you expect them to be.
Your board, your CEO, your employees—each needs a different version of the same story. You leave with language that works for each audience.
The organisations that handle reporting well aren't the ones that scrambled in April. They're the ones that looked honestly at their pay system before the pressure peaked.
Not hoping the questions don't come up. Knowing what the numbers mean—and having a clear, honest answer ready when they do.
Independent Reward Consultant
I am a reward specialist with experience in compensation, job evaluation, and pay equity—across organisations ranging from global engineering and professional services firms to fast-growing businesses in emerging markets.
My work has spanned the UK, Russia, Kazakhstan, India, and the Middle East. I have seen pay systems that hold up under scrutiny, and others that don't. I know the difference—and what it takes to get from one to the other.
I work independently, which means my only interest is helping you understand your pay system clearly and honestly.
The difference between a good pay gap report and a damaging one is often just clarity—knowing your risks, having an honest explanation ready, and not being surprised by what the data reveals.